| Symposium Intelligent political and social debate. In order to post in this forum, you must agree to a behavioral contract. |  | 
04-12-2005, 01:39 PM
|  | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northeast Malibu
Posts: 5,849
| | Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Wisconsin is going to be voting on whether to permit hunters to shoot feral cats. That's cats with no owner in sight or no collar.
Sounds cruel to kill kitty?
But what about wild song birds? These cats eat millions of them.
I like songbirds. Songbirds are mostly native species, cats aren't. Therefore, birds are essential to the balance of nature, cats aren't. Birds eat insects so the insects don't eat us. Isn't this like "Silent Spring" with cats being the villains rather than DDT? http://www.msnbc.com/id/7475469/ | 
04-12-2005, 01:53 PM
|  | Hot and Juicy | | Join Date: Nov 2000 Location: off campus
Posts: 46,387
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | I have a real problem with this, but not for the reasons that you might think. There is obviously a feral cat problem there, and the wild cat population must be controlled. I have a real problem with giving people free reign to shoot cats. If animal control personnel must trap and euthanize the cats, I can accept that, but I can't accept any Joe, Dick or Harry on the street feeling its ok to shoot cats. I think it gives the wrong message to kids, I think it leaves open the problem of domesticated house cats being shot, I think it allows too many guns in the streets. Control the cats - humanely kill the wild cats if you must to control the population and protect the wildlife, but do NOT give carte blanche for people to start shooting. Thats just asking for trouble. | 
04-12-2005, 01:59 PM
|  | Epinions Members | | Join Date: May 2001 Location: South of Bawlmer
Posts: 6,375
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Quote: | realtraveller said
Wisconsin is going to be voting on whether to permit hunters to shoot feral cats. That's cats with no owner in sight or no collar.
Sounds cruel to kill kitty?
But what about wild song birds? These cats eat millions of them.
I like songbirds. Songbirds are mostly native species, cats aren't. Therefore, birds are essential to the balance of nature, cats aren't. Birds eat insects so the insects don't eat us. Isn't this like "Silent Spring" with cats being the villains rather than DDT? http://www.msnbc.com/id/7475469/ | Feral Cats also keep the rat population down in urban areas.
I just can't imagine a bunch of yahoos like the border vigilantes all of the sudden getting excited about open season on cats.
It's, quite frankly, a little scary.
__________________ ''Resolve not to let the defeat of your favorite candidate shatter your faith in America or turn you away from politics. There will be another day. Remember the Red Sox.'' David Broder | 
04-12-2005, 04:56 PM
|  | Usagi Yojimbo | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: The Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 16,742
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | I don't blame the cats. Have you ever had birds? Delicious.
And no one should be shot just for liking something delicious. Not in my America.
-JP | 
04-12-2005, 07:26 PM
|  | Got my hands over my eyes | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,746
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Feral cats are also a significant rabies risk, so I have very mixed feelings about this.
I would expect that the usual prohibitions about firearms in urban areas would apply, so we're probably talking about decriminalizing something which is already happening. Farmers encourage a certain number of cats, but if the feral population gets out of control, I'd expect them to take action to limit the numbers in their areas. Other people living in rural areas may also see a need to decrease the cat population. If you google "Wisconsin hunt cats" you'll find a column written rather wryly which speculates on how much it would cost to "humanely" limit the feral cat population by capturing and spaying/neutering cats and then releasing. Euthanizing them would, of course, be much cheaper, but still more expensive than letting the folks in rural areas deal with the problem themselves.
__________________ Judy | 
04-12-2005, 08:05 PM
|  | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northeast Malibu
Posts: 5,849
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | There are no, I mean absolutely no stray or feral cats in So Cal.
The coyotes take care of that. No stray dogs under 20 pounds either.
Maybe Wisconsin should import some coyotes and let the natural food chain do its thing.  | 
04-12-2005, 08:09 PM
| | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,556
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Mmmmmmm.... Cat. | 
04-12-2005, 11:27 PM
|  | thread-killa | | Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,365
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | What happens if it just happens to be your family pet whose breakaway collar actually worked? | 
04-13-2005, 12:15 AM
|  | Got my hands over my eyes | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,746
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Quote: | pippadaisy said
What happens if it just happens to be your family pet whose breakaway collar actually worked? | That's one of the reasons I have mixed feelings. I think that doing this on a county by county basis would allow for better control. I don't expect "cat hunts" -- just decriminalization of activity that's already occuring.
__________________ Judy | 
04-13-2005, 12:33 PM
|  | Usagi Yojimbo | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: The Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 16,742
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Quote: | realtraveller said
Maybe Wisconsin should import some coyotes and let the natural food chain do its thing.  | The natural food chain is already doing its thing. Cats eat birds.
Maybe, instead of importing yet another species, the people could eat the cats.
Only problem with that is that, unlike birds, cats are not delicious. No matter what Ander says.
-JP (Although, maybe I just haven't been cooking them right?  ) | 
04-13-2005, 03:28 PM
|  | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northeast Malibu
Posts: 5,849
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Quote: | drmomentum said
The natural food chain is already doing its thing. Cats eat birds.
Maybe, instead of importing yet another species, the people could eat the cats.
Only problem with that is that, unlike birds, cats are not delicious. No matter what Ander says.
-JP (Although, maybe I just haven't been cooking them right?  ) | Coyotes eat cats, so they must like them. Coyotes are canines. Dogs are canines. Ergo, dogs must like cat meat. Have the people kill the cats and feed them to their dogs. | 
04-13-2005, 04:07 PM
|  | Epinions Members | | Join Date: May 2001 Location: South of Bawlmer
Posts: 6,375
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Then who is going to eat the rats? Cause I don't know any song birds that'll eat the rats.
When man messes with nature, we get mad cow disease.
__________________ ''Resolve not to let the defeat of your favorite candidate shatter your faith in America or turn you away from politics. There will be another day. Remember the Red Sox.'' David Broder | 
04-13-2005, 04:14 PM
|  | Got my hands over my eyes | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,746
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Coyotes aren't fussy, they'll pretty much eat anything they can catch.
Besides, they can't climb trees, so they won't be eating all the cats, no matter what anyone says. At least not in Wisconsin, where there really are trees.
__________________ Judy | 
04-13-2005, 06:01 PM
| | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,556
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | So perhaps it is time to genetically modify coyotes so that they can climb trees! Quote: |
Although, maybe I just haven't been cooking them right?
| Have you tried teriyaki? | 
04-13-2005, 06:03 PM
|  | Usagi Yojimbo | | Join Date: Jul 2000 Location: The Birthplace of American Democracy
Posts: 16,742
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | I think we should genetically modify people to chill out.
And maybe genetically modify cats to come teriyaki-flavored.
You know. Just in case.
-JP | 
04-13-2005, 06:13 PM
| | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Feb 2003 Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,556
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Sorry, I just had a crazy mental picture of tree-climbing coyotes and had to voice it.
Ander | 
04-13-2005, 08:09 PM
|  | Epinions Members | | Join Date: Aug 2000 Location: Northeast Malibu
Posts: 5,849
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Quote: | anderclayton said
So perhaps it is time to genetically modify coyotes so that they can climb trees!
| Actually, coyotes can climb trees. I've seen it myself.
Out here, the coyotes eat the cats. The rattlesnakes eat the rats. The roadrunners eat the rattlesnakes. The coyotes eat the roadrunners. And cars whizzing down the freeways take out the coyotes. Its the circle of life. | 
04-13-2005, 08:21 PM
|  | thread-killa | | Join Date: Dec 2000
Posts: 17,365
| | Re Cat Lovers Vs. Bird Lovers | | Yeah, but who eats the darn cars?  |  | |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is On | | | All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:10 PM. | | | |