Head Heart Body

[Uno]

I have learned that the common man (human... man and woman) can be seen from 3 points of view, there are many ways to define these three points, but one efficacious is Head Heart Body therefore mind feelings instincts.
I preput that the better action would be that one that takes advantage of one synergy of the three, but this is rare, only a perfectly balanced man can, but we common person can at least to use them one for time in the just way.
For example: If we live one history of love with the mind it is not corrected, but how many times come? We would have to use the feelings....
If I give all which I have to a person of which i am in love, use the feeling in place of the mind
Etc Etc

Have you never seen this?
If you want we make other examples much various

[taurusmoon]

Yet how often do you meet people who are so out of balance that they rely on the inappropriate tool because they have so supressed another?

For example: those who can't feel and must intellectualize everything, or those who don't think through the consequences of their actions because they live solely for physical pleasure.

And, I may be treading on thin ice here, but how much of the imbalance is gender based? Or culturally ingrained?

[Uno]

taurusmoon said

Yet how often do you meet people who are so out of balance that they rely on the inappropriate tool because they have so supressed another?

For example: those who can't feel and must intellectualize everything, or those who don't think through the consequences of their actions because they live solely for physical pleasure.

And, I may be treading on thin ice here, but how much of the imbalance is gender based? Or culturally ingrained?

Oh yes also the gendere and culturally ingrained make this, in italian we say "a dog that bites the tail" often they are the mothers who teach these things and adults pay the consequences (they are not aware), but there are also males that reason with the heart when they would have to use the head, or more often with the body (a part) in place of the feelings.
after I return on this speech, deserves of being deepened

[theworm[$]]

I think that children live with this sort of balance, but as we grow we can be "damaged" through life events, and we overcompensate.

[Uno]

theworm said

I think that children live with this sort of balance, but as we grow we can be "damaged" through life events, and we overcompensate.

True... and this is necessary, because forms the person, the problem is that the society then imposes of the models always until our dead, from these we must be waked up.
change example for to discuss:
to who it does not happen of having in house many things that do not serve, the reason would to make clean but the sentiments say "No! These are memories"...

(and our mind makes the same one with the thoughts)

[theworm[$]]

Oh don't go there! I have many "things" that I don't need. Yes - many of them are for the memories and its hard to let them go - even though they are just "things". I studied art and am a very visual person, so some of my "things" bring me joy because they are beautiful - just as a tree brings me joy.
It is a problem though that I am attached to "things".

So - how much does society demand of us, and how do those demands shape us? I think that our parents (or whoever raised us) shape us the most, and that this happens at a very young age. Thats why so many of us need therapy to "undo" what was imposed.

[Uno]

theworm said

So - how much does society demand of us, and how do those demands shape us? I think that our parents (or whoever raised us) shape us the most, and that this happens at a very young age. Thats why so many of us need therapy to "undo" what was imposed.

Yes but in young age is necessary, the mistake is when it is not grown free after in the maturity, no?
For free I do not mean anarchist, but able to choose objective